Disposition hearing report
Pg 2. Expressed Preferences
Would like to stay living with brother and grandparents, but misses mom
(contrary to all future reports) (evidence of pathogenic parenting)
Mary Atwood contacted several times prior to mothers adjudication, yet only an IDI had been ordered for the child. Why so many contacts made?
Speaking with Devonyle helped encourage alienation between him and mother as well. He told me it wasn’t his ground to stand on and that his hands were tied.
Pg 3. Documents reviewed since last hearing
Court orders, Detention documents, affidavits- None of which contain any true evidence or proof of any of the opinions or conclusions of the GAL
Visitation Reports for Cindi- Contain only good visits where the mother is attentive, loving, protective, and a good parent.
Visit reports for Bradell- No safety concerns or parenting skill issues
IDI for Kiyah- Contains heresy and lies. Defamation and negligence on the part of the therapist because the things stated in the document should have been easily proven true or not by searching public records yet she did not take the time to do that before submitting this to the court and tainting the whole case from the beginning. Especially since it all rests on her opinion of what should be according to the judges’ requests.
CER- No issues and is above average in intelligence
EVAL for Bradell- No safety issues
Court Report- Numerous lies and false information. False history of involvement and family history.
Based on these documents, it is unreasonable to continue out of home placement or anticipate any safety issue with her mother or father.
Pg 4. Guardian ad litem narrative:
Mother has a history of Domestic violence in multiple relationships. I was assaulted. That does not constitute a history of domestic violence in multiple relationships. Kiyah was removed and mother unquestionably proved herself to be a fit parent receiving praises from Judge Daniels and all of the workers who all stated that I was a great mother with a strong bond with my daughter and didn’t need intervention to achieve that. Kiyahs testimony indicates that while in her grandmothers care she has been negatively affected. Court reports show that Kiyah had been residing with her grandmother for the seven months prior to her removal. The nightmares and shadow men did not happen at moms house but at grandmaś. Kiyah also had an uncle commit suicide just a few months prior to her removal.
Kiyah is reported to be a bright physically fit child showing no signs of being abused or neglected. Kiyah was afraid to lose her mother which is the reason for the alleged ¨suicide pact¨ There was never any suicide mentioned to her mother or father prior to removal.
Visit reports for mother show affectionate and loving interactions between kiyah and her mother. Concerns about the mother’s misdirection of the worker have nothing to do with the safety of the minor. Define the word several. Documentation does not exist that says I refuse to set up a walkthrough of residence. Documentation does exist however stating that I was told I had to complete my psych eval before they would let visits occur at my home at which time I informed them that when that could happen I would allow a walk through. Documentation also exists proving that it was not the mother but the state and workers who strung out the process of setting up the eval. There is no cause for a psych eval as the mother has done nothing to warrant one. It is fishing for information to cover their tracks. The mother does not have any history of suicide attempts as the GAL states and seems to rely on to support strictly supervised visits, there is also a current lack of information regarding the reason for removal and the reason for the need to have a psych eval to begin with. Kiyahs discussion of suicide did not come from things mother and her discussed or witnessed.
Pg 5. Recommendations
Specifically, state what reasonable efforts consisted of.
Specifically, state what risk there would be if returned to mothers home.
The Barriers are identified as
1. Failure on part of mother to follow through with court ordered evaluation and attempted to mislead worker regarding approved visit locations. Neither of these are sufficient reasons for removal or continued placement and both are irrelevant to the reason for interference by the state to begin with.
2. Father needs to participate in services. He had and has completed all services as of months prior to now. Also not sufficient reason for removal or continued detention
The minor should not have had any therapy sessions prior to this report as the mother had not been adjudicated yet.

Leave a comment